Exploring the interaction between PD1 and SHP-2 using Navinci’s in situ proximity ligation assay technology has the potential to help address the current challenge of patient stratification for PD-L1/PD-1 therapies.
The importance of PD1/SHP-2 interactions in PD1 signaling
Exploring the interaction between PD1 and SHP-2 using Navinci’s in situ proximity ligation assay technology has the potential to help address the current challenge of patient stratification for PD-L1/PD-1 therapies.
PD1/SHP-2 interaction in diffuse T cell lymphoma, visualized using NaveniBright™ AP
PD1/PD-L1 is a well-known immune checkpoint that when activated, inhibits proliferation of T-cells, release of cytokines, and cytotoxicity. Cancer cells expressing the ligand PD-L1 can escape the immune system by binding to and activating PD1 on tumor specific T-cells leading to exhaustion and apoptosis of the T-cells [1, 2]. PD-L1 is used as a biomarker in IHC to identify patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments including anti-PD1 and anti PD-L1 therapies [3]. However, unfortunately not all patients respond successfully to these therapies, therefore it is crucial to advance biomarkers and the tools to study the underlying mechanisms of this immune checkpoint axis [1, 4].
Protein-protein interaction PD1/SHP-2
The activation of PD1 and the subsequent inhibiting signaling pathway requires PD1 to be bound to PD-L1, as well as being phosphorylated. The phosphorylation of PD1 occurs via the T-cell receptor (TCR) that, upon binding to MHC, activates TCR proximal src-kinases that in turn phosphorylate PD1 intracellular tyrosine residues ITIM and ITSM. When PD1 is phosphorylated and bound to PD-L1, the phosphatase SHP-2 can, via its two SH2 domains, bind to the phosphorylated sites of PD1. When bound to PD1, SHP-2 is active and de-phosphorylates its targets [5, 6] (Figure 1).
The targets of SHP-2 in this event are downstream regulators of the CD28 and TCR pathways, leading to a downregulation of PI3K/Akt and RAS/ERK, respectively. Eventually this results in the T-cell becoming inhibited, enabling the cancer cell to escape the tumor specific T-cells [7]. Of the interactions within the PD1-PD-L1 axis, the PD1-SHP2 interaction can be regarded as one of the most biologically relevant, since it determines whether or not downregulation of the T-cells can occur.
PD1/SHP-2 interaction in diffuse T cell lymphoma, visualized using NaveniBright™ AP
PD1/PD-L1 is a well-known immune checkpoint that when activated, inhibits proliferation of T-cells, release of cytokines, and cytotoxicity. Cancer cells expressing the ligand PD-L1 can escape the immune system by binding to and activating PD1 on tumor specific T-cells leading to exhaustion and apoptosis of the T-cells [1, 2]. PD-L1 is used as a biomarker in IHC to identify patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments including anti-PD1 and anti PD-L1 therapies [3]. However, unfortunately not all patients respond successfully to these therapies, therefore it is crucial to advance biomarkers and the tools to study the underlying mechanisms of this immune checkpoint axis [1, 4].
Protein-protein interaction PD1/SHP-2
The activation of PD1 and the subsequent inhibiting signaling pathway requires PD1 to be bound to PD-L1, as well as being phosphorylated. The phosphorylation of PD1 occurs via the T-cell receptor (TCR) that, upon binding to MHC, activates TCR proximal src-kinases that in turn phosphorylate PD1 intracellular tyrosine residues ITIM and ITSM. When PD1 is phosphorylated and bound to PD-L1, the phosphatase SHP-2 can, via its two SH2 domains, bind to the phosphorylated sites of PD1. When bound to PD1, SHP-2 is active and de-phosphorylates its targets [5, 6] (Figure 1).
The targets of SHP-2 in this event are downstream regulators of the CD28 and TCR pathways, leading to a downregulation of PI3K/Akt and RAS/ERK, respectively. Eventually this results in the T-cell becoming inhibited, enabling the cancer cell to escape the tumor specific T-cells [7]. Of the interactions within the PD1-PD-L1 axis, the PD1-SHP2 interaction can be regarded as one of the most biologically relevant, since it determines whether or not downregulation of the T-cells can occur.
Figure 1. Model of the PD1/PDL1 signaling pathway, resulting in SHP-2 binding to PD1 and thereby becoming active.
Figure 2. Applying the Naveni® in situ proximity ligation assay. Only if the Navenibodies are in close proximity will they generate a rolling circle amplification reaction, leading to a strong and distinct signal.
Figure 1. Model of the PD1/PDL1 signaling pathway, resulting in SHP-2 binding to PD1 and thereby becoming active.
Studies of PD1/SHP-2 interactions
Both inhibitors and activators targeting SHP2 have been developed for the treatment of different diseases. The SHP2 allosteric inhibitor SHP099 together with a PD-1 inhibitor showed that tumor growth in xenograft models of colon cancer was better controlled than it was in response to each inhibitor alone (8, 9). We have used the classic Naveni in situ proximity ligation assay to visualize the specific interaction between PD1 and SHP2 in tissues (Figure 2). This optimized application has high specificity and can be used in basic research as well as clinical research to investigate the PD1-SHP2 signaling pathway for the development of molecular antagonists for cancer therapies. The PD1/SHP2 can be used as a biomarker application for clinical use to identify patients eligible for treatment with PD1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.
Studies of PD1/SHP-2 interactions
Both inhibitors and activators targeting SHP2 have been developed for the treatment of different diseases. The SHP2 allosteric inhibitor SHP099 together with a PD-1 inhibitor showed that tumor growth in xenograft models of colon cancer was better controlled than it was in response to each inhibitor alone (8, 9). We have used the classic Naveni in situ proximity ligation assay to visualize the specific interaction between PD1 and SHP2 in tissues (Figure 2). This optimized application has high specificity and can be used in basic research as well as clinical research to investigate the PD1-SHP2 signaling pathway for the development of molecular antagonists for cancer therapies. The PD1/SHP2 can be used as a biomarker application for clinical use to identify patients eligible for treatment with PD1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.
Figure 2. Applying the Naveni® in situ proximity ligation assay. Only if the Navenibodies are in close proximity will they generate a rolling circle amplification reaction, leading to a strong and distinct signal.
Application example – T cell lymphoma and lung cancer
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tissue from patients with diffuse T cell lymphoma and Squamous cell carcinoma. Interaction was detected using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright AP.
Application example – T cell lymphoma and lung cancer
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tissue from patients with diffuse T cell lymphoma and Squamous cell carcinoma. Interaction was detected using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright AP.
Detection of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in diffuse T cell lymphoma
Detection of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in squamous cell carcinoma
Detection of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in diffuse T cell lymphoma (image 1) and in squamous cell carcinoma (image 2)
Application example – germinal centers, Hodgkins lymphoma
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tissue from patients with Hodgkins Lymphoma. Interaction was detected in germinal centers using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright AP.
Application example – germinal centers, Hodgkins lymphoma
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tissue from patients with Hodgkins Lymphoma. Interaction was detected in germinal centers using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright AP.
Visualization of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in germinal center
Visualization of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in germinal center
Visualization of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in germinal center
Application example – tonsil
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tonsil tissue. Interaction was detected using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright HRP.
Application example – tonsil
Staining of PD1/SHP-2 interaction in human tonsil tissue. Interaction was detected using monoclonal antibodies against PD1 and SHP-2 followed by NaveniBright HRP.
PD1/SHP-2 interaction in tonsil tissue positive signals
PD1/SHP-2 interaction in tonsil tissue with no staining in negative control
PD1/SHP-2 interaction in tonsil tissue positive signals compared with no staining in negative control
How to detect PD1/SHP-2
Use our flexible products NaveniBright HRP or NaveniBright AP. For further information about PD1/SHP-2 monoclonal antibodies and protocols, contact us using the form below.
How to detect PD1/SHP-2
Use our flexible products NaveniBright HRP or NaveniBright AP. For further information about PD1/SHP-2 monoclonal antibodies and protocols, contact us using the form below.
NaveniBright HRP
The assay is designed to be used with a mouse and a rabbit primary pair. Chromogenic readout with HRP substrate.
NaveniBright AP
The assay is designed to be used with a mouse and rabbit primary antibody pair. Chromogenic readout with AP substrate.
NaveniBright HRP
The assay is designed to be used with a mouse and a rabbit primary pair. Chromogenic readout with HRP substrate.
NaveniBright AP
The assay is designed to be used with a mouse and rabbit primary antibody pair. Chromogenic readout with AP substrate.
References
- Pu Y, Ji Q. Tumor-Associated Macrophages Regulate PD-1/PD-L1 Immunosuppression. Front Immunol. 2022 May 3;13:874589. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.874589
- Gordon, S., et al. PD-1 expression by tumour-associated macrophages inhibits phagocytosis and tumour immunity. Nature 545, 495–499 (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nature22396
- Robert C, A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 3801. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y
- Sánchez-Magraner L, et al. High PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Interaction Infers Tumor Selection and Therapeutic Sensitivity to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment. Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 1;80(19):4244-4257. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1117
- Patsoukis N, et al. Revisiting the PD-1 pathway. Sci Adv 2020 Sep 18;6(38). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2712
- Patsoukis N, et al. Interaction of SHP-2 SH2 domains with PD-1 ITSM induces PD-1 dimerization and SHP-2 activation. Commun Biol. 2020 Mar 17;3(1):128. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0845-0
- Enfu Hui, et al. T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1–mediated inhibition. Science. 2017 Mar 31; 355(6332): 1428–1433. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf1292
- Song Y, Zhao M, Zhang H, Yu B. Double-edged roles of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 in cancer and its inhibitors in clinical trials. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;230:107966. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107966
- Zhao M, Guo W, Wu Y, et al. SHP2 inhibition triggers anti-tumor immunity and synergizes with PD-1 blockade. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9(2):304-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.08.009